In Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020, the Core i5-13400 is slightly faster than the Core i9-10900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-13400
- Up to 7% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 – 117 vs 109 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
- Is 2 years and 8 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Apr 30, 2020
- Is 2 years and 8 months newer
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-10900KF
No clear advantages
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 FPS Calculator
Core i5-13400 vs Core i9-10900KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-13400 vs Core i9-10900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-13400 vs Core i9-10900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-13400
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
68%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
87%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Core i9-10900KF
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
61%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-13400 Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900KF Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
$221.00 | MSRP | $509.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1200 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
