In Elden Ring, the Core i5-13400 is slightly slower than the Core i3-330M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-13400
- Is 12 years and 11 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 12 years and 11 months newer
Core i3-330M
- Up to 4% faster in Elden Ring – 145 vs 140 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Elden Ring
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Elden Ring FPS Calculator
Core i5-13400 vs Core i3-330M: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
145 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
100 FPS
95%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-13400 vs Core i3-330M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-13400 vs Core i3-330M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-13400
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
20%
L3 Cache
3 MB
15%
Base Frequency
2.133 GHz
85%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
22%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-13400 Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-330M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| $221.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGAG1 |
| 65W | Power Consumption | 35W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
