The Core i5-1335U is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the EPYC 7402. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i5-1335U
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 92% less energy – 15 vs 180 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the EPYC 7402
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 48 vs 12 threads
Core i5-1335U vs EPYC 7402
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-1335U
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
218
100%
Min 1% FPS
149
100%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i5-1335U vs EPYC 7402 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-1335U vs EPYC 7402 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-1335U vs EPYC 7402 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-1335U
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
10-core
42%
L3 Cache
12 MB
9%
Base Frequency
1.3 GHz
46%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
EPYC 7402
Aug 7th, 2019
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.35 GHz
73%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
62%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i5-1335U | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | EPYC 7402 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Aug 7th, 2019 |
| $340.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| Intel BGA 1744 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
| Raptor Lake-U | Codename | Rome |
15 W | Power Consumption | 180 W |
| Performance | ||
| 10 | Cores | 24 |
| 12 | Threads | 48 |
| 1.3 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.8 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.4 GHz |
| 12 MB | L3 Cache | 128 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5200 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
Iris Xe Graphics 80EU | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | No |
