Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-12100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-12100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600K is 82 days older than the cheaper Core i3-12100F.
Advantages of Core i5-12600K
- Performs up to 3% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i3-12100F - 389 vs 379 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i5-12600K - $76.80 vs $172.99
- Up to 55% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i5-12600K - $0.20 vs $0.44 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600K - 58 vs 125 Watts
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
389
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
45%
Price, $
$172.99
44%
FPS Winner
Buy for $172.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 264 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
379
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.2/FPS
100%
Price, $
$76.8
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $76.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 265 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-12600K | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 58 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |