In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i5-12500T is slightly slower than the Xeon W3565. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-12500T
- Is 12 years and 2 months newer – Jan 16, 2022 vs Nov 01, 2009
- Is 12 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 35 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 73% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon W3565
- Up to 15% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 196 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 15% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i5-12500T vs Xeon W3565: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-12500T vs Xeon W3565 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-12500T vs Xeon W3565 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-12500T
Jan 16th, 2022
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
18 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
62%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Xeon W3565
Nov 1st, 2009
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
44%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
79%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-12500T Jan 16th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon W3565 Nov 1st, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 16th, 2022 | Released | Nov 1st, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1366 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
