In Rust, the Core i5-12500T is faster than the Xeon E5-2680. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-12500T
- Up to 18% faster in Rust – 248 vs 210 FPS
- Up to 18% faster in Rust
- Is 9 years and 10 months newer – Jan 27, 2022 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 9 years and 10 months newer
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 35 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 73% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5-2680
No clear advantages
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i5-12500T vs Xeon E5-2680: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Xeon E5-2680
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
210 FPS
85%
Min 1% FPS
43 FPS
61%
Price, $
$211.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-12500T vs Xeon E5-2680 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-12500T vs Xeon E5-2680 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-12500T
Jan 27th, 2022
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
18 MB
90%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Xeon E5-2680
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
80%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-12500T Jan 27th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-2680 Mar 6th, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Mar 6th, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA2011 |
35W | Power Consumption | 130W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
