In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i5-12500T is slightly slower than the Xeon E5-2678 v3. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-12500T
- Consumes up to 71% less energy – 35 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 71% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5-2678 v3
- Up to 5% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 179 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i5-12500T vs Xeon E5-2678 v3: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-12500T vs Xeon E5-2678 v3 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-12500T vs Xeon E5-2678 v3 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-12500T
Jan 14th, 2022
Cores
6-core
50%
L3 Cache
18 MB
60%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
80%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Xeon E5-2678 v3
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
75%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
44%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-12500T Jan 14th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-2678 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 14th, 2022 | Released | – |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA2011-3 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
