In Deathloop, the Core i5-12500T is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 7 265F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-12500T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core Ultra 7 265F
- Up to 7% faster in Deathloop – 242 vs 227 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in Deathloop
- Is 2 years and 11 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Jan 14, 2022
- Is 2 years and 11 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-12500T vs Core Ultra 7 265F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
242 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
181 FPS
100%
Price, $
$286
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.18/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-12500T vs Core Ultra 7 265F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-12500T vs Core Ultra 7 265F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-12500T
Jan 14th, 2022
Cores
6-core
30%
L3 Cache
18 MB
60%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
83%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
75%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-12500T Jan 14th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265F Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 14th, 2022 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $379.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1851 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
