In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i5-12500T is slightly slower than the Core i9-9940X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-12500T
- Is 3 years and 2 months newer – Jan 14, 2022 vs Oct 19, 2018
- Is 3 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 79% less energy – 35 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 79% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-9940X
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 172 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i5-12500T vs Core i9-9940X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-9940X
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
172 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
129 FPS
100%
Price, $
$1288.88
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.49/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-12500T vs Core i9-9940X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-12500T vs Core i9-9940X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-12500T
Jan 14th, 2022
Cores
6-core
43%
L3 Cache
18 MB
94%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
61%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
98%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Core i9-9940X
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
56%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-12500T Jan 14th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-9940X Oct 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 14th, 2022 | Released | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| – | MSRP | $1,387.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA2066 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 165 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
