In Deathloop, the Core i5-12500T is slightly slower than the Core i9-13900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-12500T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-13900F
- Up to 6% faster in Deathloop – 240 vs 227 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Deathloop
- Is 11 months and 20 days newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Jan 14, 2022
- Is 11 months and 20 days newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-12500T vs Core i9-13900F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
240 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
180 FPS
100%
Price, $
$529.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.2/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-12500T vs Core i9-13900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-12500T vs Core i9-13900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-12500T
Jan 14th, 2022
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
18 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
79%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
86%
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-12500T Jan 14th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900F Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 14th, 2022 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $524.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
