In Deathloop, the Core i5-12400T is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 9 275HX. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-12400T
- Consumes up to 36% less energy – 35 vs 55 Watts
- Consumes up to 36% less energy
Core Ultra 9 275HX
- Up to 7% faster in Deathloop – 242 vs 226 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in Deathloop
- Is 2 years and 11 months newer – Jan 13, 2025 vs Jan 14, 2022
- Is 2 years and 11 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-12400T vs Core Ultra 9 275HX: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 9 275HX
Jan 13th, 2025
Average FPS
242 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
182 FPS
100%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-12400T vs Core Ultra 9 275HX in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-12400T vs Core Ultra 9 275HX in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-12400T
Jan 14th, 2022
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
18 MB
50%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
78%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
75%
Core Ultra 9 275HX
Jan 13th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-12400T Jan 14th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 275HX Jan 13th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 14th, 2022 | Released | Jan 13th, 2025 |
| $192.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | Intel BGA 2114 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 55 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
