In Deathloop, the Core i5-12400T is slightly faster than the Core i3-6100. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-12400T
- Up to 4% faster in Deathloop – 226 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Deathloop
- Is 6 years and 4 months newer – Jan 16, 2022 vs Sep 01, 2015
- Is 6 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 35 vs 51 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
Core i3-6100
No clear advantages
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-12400T vs Core i3-6100: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-6100
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
218 FPS
96%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
96%
Price, $
$70.65
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-12400T vs Core i3-6100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-12400T vs Core i3-6100 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-12400T
Jan 16th, 2022
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
18 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
49%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Core i3-6100
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
4 MB
22%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
44%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-12400T Jan 16th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-6100 Sep 1st, 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 16th, 2022 | Released | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| $192.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 51 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 2133 MHz (DDR4) |
| UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 530 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
