In Atomfall, the Core i5-12400F is slightly faster than the Ryzen 3 3200G. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $114 more expensive!
Core i5-12400F
- Up to 13% faster in Atomfall – 228 vs 202 FPS
- Up to 13% faster in Atomfall
- Is 2 years and 5 months newer – Jan 04, 2022 vs Jul 07, 2019
- Is 2 years and 5 months newer
Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 63% cheaper – $65.98 vs $179.99
- Up to 63% cheaper
- Up to 59% better value in Atomfall – $0.32 vs $0.78/FPS
- Up to 59% better value in Atomfall
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-12400F vs Ryzen 3 3200G: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-12400F
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
228 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
171 FPS
100%
Price, $
$179.99
36%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
41%
Ryzen 3 3200G
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
202 FPS
89%
Min 1% FPS
151 FPS
88%
Price, $
$65.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-12400F vs Ryzen 3 3200G in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-12400F vs Ryzen 3 3200G in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-12400F
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
18 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Ryzen 3 3200G
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
4 MB
22%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
91%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-12400F Jan 4th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 3 3200G Jul 7th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2022 | Released | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| $174.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | AM4 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | DDR4 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Radeon Vega 8 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
