In Control, the Core i5-12400F is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 7 265K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-12400F
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Core Ultra 7 265K
- Up to 2% faster in Control – 255 vs 251 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Control
- Is 2 years and 9 months newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Jan 04, 2022
- Is 2 years and 9 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Control FPS Calculator
Core i5-12400F vs Core Ultra 7 265K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-12400F
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
251 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
165 FPS
99%
Price, $
$159.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.63/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 7 265K
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
255 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
100%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-12400F vs Core Ultra 7 265K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-12400F vs Core Ultra 7 265K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-12400F
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
6-core
30%
L3 Cache
18 MB
60%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
64%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
80%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
75%
Core Ultra 7 265K
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-12400F Jan 4th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265K Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2024 |
$174.00 | MSRP | $394.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1851 |
65W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
