Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-12400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-12400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 734 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-12400F.
Advantages of Core i5-12400F
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $111.34 vs $512.79
- Up to 76% better value when playing Borderlands 3 than Core i9-14900F - $0.47 vs $1.98 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 9% better in Borderlands 3 than Core i5-12400F - 259 vs 238 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400F - 32 vs 12 threads
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
238
92%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
100%
Price, $
$111.34
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $111.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
259
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.98/FPS
24%
Price, $
$512.79
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for $512.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-12400F | vs | Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |