Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-12400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-12400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900 is 734 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-12400F.
Advantages of Core i5-12400F
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i9-14900 - $109.95 vs $574.75
- Up to 80% better value when playing Fortnite than Core i9-14900 - $0.46 vs $2.33 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 4% better in Fortnite than Core i5-12400F - 247 vs 237 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400F - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
237
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.46/FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $109.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
Buy for $574.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 191 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-12400F | vs | Core i9-14900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |