In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i5-12400F is slightly slower than the Core i7-620M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-12400F
- Is 11 years and 11 months newer – Jan 04, 2022 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 11 years and 11 months newer
Core i7-620M
- Up to 12% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 245 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 12% faster in The Last of Us Part I
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i5-12400F vs Core i7-620M: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-12400F
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
218 FPS
89%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
89%
Price, $
$179.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.82/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-12400F vs Core i7-620M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-12400F vs Core i7-620M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-12400F
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
18 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
93%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Core i7-620M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
4 MB
22%
Base Frequency
2.677 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
76%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
22%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-12400F Jan 4th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-620M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2022 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
$174.00 | MSRP | $332.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | Intel BGA 1288 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | HD Graphics (Ironlake) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
