Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-12400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-12400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14600K is 651 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-12400F.
Advantages of Core i5-12400F
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i5-14600K - $109.95 vs $239.99
- Up to 45% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than Core i5-14600K - $0.70 vs $1.27 per FPS
Advantages of Core i5-14600K
- Performs up to 21% better in The Callisto Protocol than Core i5-12400F - 189 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400F - 20 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12400F doesn't have integrated graphics
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
156
83%
Value, $/FPS
$0.7/FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $109.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 307 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
189
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.27/FPS
55%
Price, $
$239.99
45%
FPS Winner
Buy for $239.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 306 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-12400F | vs | Core i5-14600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 14 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |