In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i5-12400F is slightly slower than the Core i5-11600 and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $40 more expensive!
Core i5-12400F
- Is 9 months and 20 days newer – Jan 04, 2022 vs Mar 16, 2021
- Is 9 months and 20 days newer
Core i5-11600
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 170 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 22% cheaper – $140.00 vs $179.99
- Up to 22% cheaper
- Up to 23% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.82 vs $1.06/FPS
- Up to 23% better value in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i5-12400F vs Core i5-11600: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-12400F
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
169 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
100%
Price, $
$179.99
77%
Value, $/FPS
$1.06/FPS
77%
Core i5-11600
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
170 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
100%
Price, $
$140
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.82/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-12400F vs Core i5-11600 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-12400F vs Core i5-11600 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-12400F
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
18 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
92%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Core i5-11600
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
67%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-12400F Jan 4th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-11600 Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2022 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
$174.00 | MSRP | $213.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
