Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 614 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 4% better in F1 22 than Core i5-10400F - 286 vs 276 FPS
Advantages of Core i5-10400F
- Up to 33% cheaper than Core i5-12400F - $74.38 vs $110.61
- Up to 31% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i5-12400F - $0.27 vs $0.39 per FPS
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
286
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
69%
Price, $
$110.61
67%
FPS Winner
Buy for $110.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 204 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
276
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$74.38
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $74.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 205 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-12400F | vs | Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |