In Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020, the Core i5-12400 is faster than the Xeon W3550. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-12400
- Up to 24% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 – 115 vs 93 FPS
- Up to 24% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
- Is 12 years and 4 months newer – Jan 04, 2022 vs Aug 09, 2009
- Is 12 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon W3550
No clear advantages
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 FPS Calculator
Core i5-12400 vs Xeon W3550: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-12400
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
115 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
86 FPS
100%
Price, $
$199
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.73/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-12400 vs Xeon W3550 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-12400 vs Xeon W3550 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-12400
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
18 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
82%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Xeon W3550
Aug 9th, 2009
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
44%
Base Frequency
3.066 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
76%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-12400 Jan 4th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon W3550 Aug 9th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Aug 9th, 2009 |
| $199.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1366 |
65W | Power Consumption | 130W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
