In Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020, the Core i5-12400 is slightly slower than the Core i9-14900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-12400
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-14900KF
- Up to 17% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 – 134 vs 115 FPS
- Up to 17% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
- Is 1 year and 9 months newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Jan 04, 2022
- Is 1 year and 9 months newer
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 FPS Calculator
Core i5-12400 vs Core i9-14900KF: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
134 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
100 FPS
100%
Price, $
$442.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.3/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-12400 vs Core i9-14900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-12400 vs Core i9-14900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-12400
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
18 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
73%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
86%
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-12400 Jan 4th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900KF Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
$199.00 | MSRP | $564.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1700 |
65W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
