Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-12400 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-12400 is 614 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-10700F - 204 vs 191 FPS
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $143.57 vs $224.00
- Up to 40% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-10700F - $0.70 vs $1.17 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-10700F
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400 - 16 vs 12 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
204
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.7/FPS
100%
Price, $
$143.57
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $143.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 156 minutes ago
Buy for $224 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 154 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-12400 | vs | Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |