In Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020, the Core i5-1230U is slower than the Core i9-13900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-1230U
- Consumes up to 86% less energy – 9 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 86% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-13900F
- Up to 23% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 – 129 vs 105 FPS
- Up to 23% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
- Is 10 months and 10 days newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Feb 23, 2022
- Is 10 months and 10 days newer
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 FPS Calculator
Core i5-1230U vs Core i9-13900F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
129 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
97 FPS
100%
Price, $
$529.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.1/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-1230U vs Core i9-13900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-1230U vs Core i9-13900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-1230U
Feb 23rd, 2022
Cores
10-core
42%
L3 Cache
12 MB
33%
Base Frequency
1 GHz
50%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
79%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-1230U Feb 23rd, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900F Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 23rd, 2022 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $524.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1781 | Socket | LGA1700 |
9 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4, DDR5 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
Iris Xe 80EU | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
