In Rust, the Core i5-11600T is faster than the Xeon X3430. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-11600T
- Up to 16% faster in Rust – 241 vs 208 FPS
- Up to 16% faster in Rust
- Is 11 years and 6 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Sep 08, 2009
- Is 11 years and 6 months newer
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon X3430
No clear advantages
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i5-11600T vs Xeon X3430: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-11600T vs Xeon X3430 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-11600T vs Xeon X3430 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-11600T
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.7 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Xeon X3430
Sep 8th, 2009
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
68%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
42%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-11600T Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X3430 Sep 8th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
| $213.00 | MSRP | $189.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1156 |
35W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
