In Atomfall, the Core i5-11600T is faster than the Xeon E5-2609. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-11600T
- Up to 19% faster in Atomfall – 222 vs 187 FPS
- Up to 19% faster in Atomfall
- Is 9 years and 9 days newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 9 years and 9 days newer
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 35 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 56% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5-2609
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-11600T vs Xeon E5-2609: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-11600T vs Xeon E5-2609 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-11600T vs Xeon E5-2609 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-11600T
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.7 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Xeon E5-2609
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
10 MB
83%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-11600T Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-2609 Mar 6th, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 6th, 2012 |
| $213.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA2011 |
35W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
