In Deathloop, the Core i5-11600T is slightly faster than the Ryzen 5 3600X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-11600T
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 224 vs 222 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
- Is 1 year and 8 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Jul 07, 2019
- Is 1 year and 8 months newer
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 5 3600X
No clear advantages
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-11600T vs Ryzen 5 3600X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 5 3600X
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
222 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
99%
Price, $
$105.89
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-11600T vs Ryzen 5 3600X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-11600T vs Ryzen 5 3600X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-11600T
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
38%
Base Frequency
1.7 GHz
45%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
93%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Ryzen 5 3600X
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-11600T Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 3600X Jul 7th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
$213.00 | MSRP | $249.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | AM4 |
35W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
