In Deathloop, the Core i5-11600T is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 5 225. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-11600T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core Ultra 5 225
- Up to 6% faster in Deathloop – 238 vs 225 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Deathloop
- Is 3 years and 9 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Mar 16, 2021
- Is 3 years and 9 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-11600T vs Core Ultra 5 225: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-11600T vs Core Ultra 5 225 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-11600T vs Core Ultra 5 225 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-11600T
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
60%
L3 Cache
12 MB
60%
Base Frequency
1.7 GHz
52%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
84%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
50%
Core Ultra 5 225
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-11600T Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 5 225 Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
$213.00 | MSRP | $246.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1851 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 16EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
