In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i5-11600T is slightly slower than the Core i9-9900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-11600T
- Is 2 years and 2 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Jan 08, 2019
- Is 2 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-9900KF
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 171 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i5-11600T vs Core i9-9900KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-9900KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
171 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
128 FPS
100%
Price, $
$399
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.33/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-11600T vs Core i9-9900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-11600T vs Core i9-9900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-11600T
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
12 MB
75%
Base Frequency
1.7 GHz
47%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
82%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i9-9900KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
83%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-11600T Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-9900KF Jan 8th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Jan 8th, 2019 |
$213.00 | MSRP | $488.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
