In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i5-11600T is slightly slower than the Core i7-970. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-11600T
- Is 10 years and 7 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Jul 19, 2010
- Is 10 years and 7 months newer
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 35 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 73% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-970
- Up to 9% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 239 vs 220 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in The Last of Us Part I
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i5-11600T vs Core i7-970: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-11600T vs Core i7-970 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-11600T vs Core i7-970 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-11600T
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.7 GHz
53%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i7-970
Jul 19th, 2010
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
85%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-11600T Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-970 Jul 19th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Jul 19th, 2010 |
| $213.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1366 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
