In Atomfall, the Core i5-11600T is faster than the Core i7-930. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-11600T
- Up to 19% faster in Atomfall – 222 vs 187 FPS
- Up to 19% faster in Atomfall
- Is 11 years and 16 days newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Feb 28, 2010
- Is 11 years and 16 days newer
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 35 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 73% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-930
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-11600T vs Core i7-930: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-930
Feb 28th, 2010
Average FPS
187 FPS
84%
Min 1% FPS
140 FPS
84%
Price, $
$307.29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.64/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-11600T vs Core i7-930 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-11600T vs Core i7-930 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-11600T
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.7 GHz
61%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i7-930
Feb 28th, 2010
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.066 GHz
75%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-11600T Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-930 Feb 28th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Feb 28th, 2010 |
| $213.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1366 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
