In Deathloop, the Core i5-11600T is slightly slower than the Core i7-14700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-11600T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-14700F
- Up to 6% faster in Deathloop – 239 vs 225 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Deathloop
- Is 2 years and 9 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Mar 16, 2021
- Is 2 years and 9 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-11600T vs Core i7-14700F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-14700F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
239 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
179 FPS
100%
Price, $
$302.97
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.26/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-11600T vs Core i7-14700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-11600T vs Core i7-14700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-11600T
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
30%
L3 Cache
12 MB
36%
Base Frequency
1.7 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
76%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
57%
Core i7-14700F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
33 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-11600T Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-14700F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
$213.00 | MSRP | $359.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
