In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i5-11600T is slightly slower than the Core i3-7100T. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-11600T
- Is 4 years and 2 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 4 years and 2 months newer
Core i3-7100T
- Up to 6% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 181 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i5-11600T vs Core i3-7100T: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
181 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
136 FPS
100%
Price, $
$25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.13/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-11600T vs Core i3-7100T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-11600T vs Core i3-7100T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-11600T
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.7 GHz
50%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i3-7100T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
75%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-11600T Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-7100T Jan 3rd, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| $213.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 35 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
