In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i5-11600T is slightly slower than the Core i3-6100. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-11600T
- Is 5 years and 6 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Sep 01, 2015
- Is 5 years and 6 months newer
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 35 vs 51 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
Core i3-6100
- Up to 5% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 179 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i5-11600T vs Core i3-6100: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-6100
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
179 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
134 FPS
100%
Price, $
$70.65
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-11600T vs Core i3-6100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-11600T vs Core i3-6100 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-11600T
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.7 GHz
46%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i3-6100
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
4 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
67%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-11600T Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-6100 Sep 1st, 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| $213.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 51 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2133 MHz (DDR4) |
| UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 530 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
