In Atomfall, the Core i5-11600T is slightly faster than the Core i3-4160. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-11600T
- Up to 12% faster in Atomfall – 222 vs 199 FPS
- Up to 12% faster in Atomfall
- Is 6 years and 7 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Jul 21, 2014
- Is 6 years and 7 months newer
- Consumes up to 35% less energy – 35 vs 54 Watts
- Consumes up to 35% less energy
Core i3-4160
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-11600T vs Core i3-4160: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-4160
Jul 21st, 2014
Average FPS
199 FPS
90%
Min 1% FPS
149 FPS
90%
Price, $
$24.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-11600T vs Core i3-4160 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-11600T vs Core i3-4160 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-11600T
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.7 GHz
47%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i3-4160
Jul 21st, 2014
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-11600T Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-4160 Jul 21st, 2014 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| $213.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1150 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 54 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4400 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
