In Deathloop, the Core i5-11600KF is slightly faster than the Xeon E3-1240. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-11600KF
- Up to 3% faster in Deathloop – 227 vs 220 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Deathloop
- Is 9 years and 11 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Apr 03, 2011
- Is 9 years and 11 months newer
Xeon E3-1240
- Consumes up to 36% less energy – 80 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 36% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-11600KF vs Xeon E3-1240: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-11600KF
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
227 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
170 FPS
100%
Price, $
$189
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.83/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-11600KF vs Xeon E3-1240 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-11600KF vs Xeon E3-1240 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-11600KF
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Xeon E3-1240
Apr 3rd, 2011
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
85%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
76%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-11600KF Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E3-1240 Apr 3rd, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2011 |
| $237.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1155 |
| 125W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
