In Deathloop, the Core i5-11600KF is slightly faster than the Core i7-930 and it's also a better value for money, as it's $140 cheaper!
Core i5-11600KF
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop – 227 vs 223 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop
- Is 11 years and 16 days newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Feb 28, 2010
- Is 11 years and 16 days newer
- Up to 46% cheaper – $167.00 vs $307.29
- Up to 46% cheaper
- Up to 47% better value in Deathloop – $0.73 vs $1.37/FPS
- Up to 47% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 4% less energy – 125 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 4% less energy
Core i7-930
No clear advantages
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-11600KF vs Core i7-930: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-11600KF
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
227 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
170 FPS
100%
Price, $
$167
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.73/FPS
100%
Core i7-930
Feb 28th, 2010
Average FPS
223 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
98%
Price, $
$307.29
54%
Value, $/FPS
$1.37/FPS
53%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-11600KF vs Core i7-930 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-11600KF vs Core i7-930 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-11600KF
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i7-930
Feb 28th, 2010
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
72%
Turbo Frequency
3.066 GHz
63%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-11600KF Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-930 Feb 28th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Feb 28th, 2010 |
| $237.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1366 |
125 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
