Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11600KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11600KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 659 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11600KF.
Advantages of Core i5-11600KF
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $150.00 vs $899.99
- Up to 83% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-13400F - $1.02 vs $6.08 per FPS
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 1% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-11600KF - 148 vs 147 FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
147
99%
Value, $/FPS
$1.02/FPS
100%
Price, $
$150
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
148
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.08/FPS
17%
Price, $
$899.99
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-11600KF | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |