Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-12400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-12400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 294 days older than the cheaper Core i5-12400F.
Advantages of Core i5-12400F
- Up to 26% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - $111.34 vs $150.00
- Up to 26% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-11600KF - $0.78 vs $1.06 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 97 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
142
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
100%
Price, $
$111.34
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $111.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 97 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-11600KF | vs | Core i5-12400F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |