In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i5-11600KF is slightly slower than the Core i5-11400F and it's also a slightly worse value for money, as it's $5 more expensive!
Core i5-11600KF
No clear advantages
Core i5-11400F
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 170 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 2% cheaper – $203.16 vs $208.31
- Up to 2% cheaper
- Up to 3% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $1.19 vs $1.23/FPS
- Up to 3% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i5-11600KF vs Core i5-11400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-11600KF
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
169 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
99%
Price, $
$208.31
97%
Value, $/FPS
$1.23/FPS
97%
Core i5-11400F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
170 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
128 FPS
100%
Price, $
$203.16
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.19/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-11600KF vs Core i5-11400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-11600KF vs Core i5-11400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-11600KF
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i5-11400F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
90%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-11600KF Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-11400F Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| $237.00 | MSRP | $157.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
