In Alan Wake 2, the Core i5-11600KF is slightly slower than the Core i5-10400F and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $69 more expensive!
Core i5-11600KF
- Is 10 months and 15 days newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Apr 30, 2020
- Is 10 months and 15 days newer
Core i5-10400F
- Up to 1% faster in Alan Wake 2 – 237 vs 234 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Alan Wake 2
- Up to 33% cheaper – $139.55 vs $208.31
- Up to 33% cheaper
- Up to 35% better value in Alan Wake 2 – $0.58 vs $0.89/FPS
- Up to 35% better value in Alan Wake 2
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Alan Wake 2 FPS Calculator
Core i5-11600KF vs Core i5-10400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-11600KF
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
234 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
170 FPS
99%
Price, $
$208.31
66%
Value, $/FPS
$0.89/FPS
65%
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
237 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
171 FPS
100%
Price, $
$139.55
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-11600KF vs Core i5-10400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-11600KF vs Core i5-10400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-11600KF
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
88%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
83%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-11600KF Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-10400F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| $237.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
