In Rust, the Core i5-11600K is faster than the Celeron 847. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-11600K
- Up to 18% faster in Rust – 248 vs 210 FPS
- Up to 18% faster in Rust
- Is 9 years and 8 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Jun 19, 2011
- Is 9 years and 8 months newer
Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 86% less energy – 17 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 86% less energy
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i5-11600K vs Celeron 847: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-11600K
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
70 FPS
100%
Price, $
$199
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.8/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-11600K vs Celeron 847 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-11600K vs Celeron 847 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-11600K
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Celeron 847
Jun 19th, 2011
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
2 MB
17%
Base Frequency
1.1 GHz
28%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-11600K Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron 847 Jun 19th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 19th, 2011 |
| $262.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | Intel BGA 1023 |
| 125W | Power Consumption | 17W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
