In Deathloop, the Core i5-11600 is slightly faster than the Xeon E5530. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-11600
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 226 vs 223 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
- Is 11 years and 11 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Mar 30, 2009
- Is 11 years and 11 months newer
- Consumes up to 19% less energy – 65 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 19% less energy
Xeon E5530
No clear advantages
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-11600 vs Xeon E5530: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-11600 vs Xeon E5530 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-11600 vs Xeon E5530 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-11600
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Xeon E5530
Mar 30th, 2009
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
2.666 GHz
56%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
33%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-11600 Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5530 Mar 30th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 30th, 2009 |
$213.00 | MSRP | $530.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1366 |
65W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
