In Control, the Core i5-11600 is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 7 265F. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $148 cheaper!
Core i5-11600
- Up to 51% cheaper – $140.00 vs $288.00
- Up to 51% cheaper
- Up to 51% better value in Control – $0.55 vs $1.13/FPS
- Up to 51% better value in Control
Core Ultra 7 265F
- Up to 1% faster in Control – 254 vs 251 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Control
- Is 3 years and 9 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Mar 16, 2021
- Is 3 years and 9 months newer
Control FPS Calculator
Core i5-11600 vs Core Ultra 7 265F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-11600
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
251 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
165 FPS
99%
Price, $
$140
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
254 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
100%
Price, $
$288
48%
Value, $/FPS
$1.13/FPS
49%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-11600 vs Core Ultra 7 265F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-11600 vs Core Ultra 7 265F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-11600
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
30%
L3 Cache
12 MB
40%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
91%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
50%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-11600 Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265F Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
$213.00 | MSRP | $379.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
