In Deathloop, the Core i5-11600 is slightly slower than the Core i9-14900KF. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $290 cheaper!
Core i5-11600
- Up to 67% cheaper – $140.00 vs $429.99
- Up to 67% cheaper
- Up to 65% better value in Deathloop – $0.61 vs $1.76/FPS
- Up to 65% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Core i9-14900KF
- Up to 7% faster in Deathloop – 244 vs 227 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in Deathloop
- Is 2 years and 7 months newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Mar 16, 2021
- Is 2 years and 7 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-11600 vs Core i9-14900KF: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-11600
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
227 FPS
93%
Min 1% FPS
170 FPS
93%
Price, $
$140
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.61/FPS
100%
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
244 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
183 FPS
100%
Price, $
$429.99
32%
Value, $/FPS
$1.76/FPS
35%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-11600 vs Core i9-14900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-11600 vs Core i9-14900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-11600
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
12 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
87%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
80%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
57%
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-11600 Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900KF Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
$213.00 | MSRP | $564.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1700 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
