In Deathloop, the Core i5-11600 is slightly slower than the Core i9-13900F. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $390 cheaper!
Core i5-11600
- Up to 74% cheaper – $140.00 vs $529.95
- Up to 74% cheaper
- Up to 72% better value in Deathloop – $0.61 vs $2.20/FPS
- Up to 72% better value in Deathloop
Core i9-13900F
- Up to 6% faster in Deathloop – 240 vs 226 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Deathloop
- Is 1 year and 9 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Mar 16, 2021
- Is 1 year and 9 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-11600 vs Core i9-13900F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-11600
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
226 FPS
94%
Min 1% FPS
170 FPS
94%
Price, $
$140
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.61/FPS
100%
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
240 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
180 FPS
100%
Price, $
$529.95
26%
Value, $/FPS
$2.2/FPS
28%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-11600 vs Core i9-13900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-11600 vs Core i9-13900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-11600
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
12 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
86%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
57%
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-11600 Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900F Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
$213.00 | MSRP | $524.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
