In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i5-11600 is slower than the Core i7-930. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $167 cheaper!
Core i5-11600
- Is 11 years and 16 days newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Feb 28, 2010
- Is 11 years and 16 days newer
- Up to 54% cheaper – $140.00 vs $307.29
- Up to 54% cheaper
- Up to 46% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.82 vs $1.51/FPS
- Up to 46% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Core i7-930
- Up to 19% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 203 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 19% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i5-11600 vs Core i7-930: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-11600
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
170 FPS
84%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
84%
Price, $
$140
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.82/FPS
100%
Core i7-930
Feb 28th, 2010
Average FPS
203 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
152 FPS
100%
Price, $
$307.29
45%
Value, $/FPS
$1.51/FPS
54%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-11600 vs Core i7-930 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-11600 vs Core i7-930 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-11600
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i7-930
Feb 28th, 2010
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.066 GHz
64%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-11600 Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-930 Feb 28th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Feb 28th, 2010 |
| $213.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1366 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
