In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i5-11600 is slightly slower than the Core i7-10700F. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $190 cheaper!
Core i5-11600
- Is 10 months and 15 days newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Apr 30, 2020
- Is 10 months and 15 days newer
- Up to 58% cheaper – $140.00 vs $329.95
- Up to 58% cheaper
- Up to 57% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.82 vs $1.91/FPS
- Up to 57% better value in The Last of Us Part II
Core i7-10700F
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 172 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i5-11600 vs Core i7-10700F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-11600
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
170 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
98%
Price, $
$140
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.82/FPS
100%
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
172 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
129 FPS
100%
Price, $
$329.95
42%
Value, $/FPS
$1.91/FPS
43%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-11600 vs Core i7-10700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-11600 vs Core i7-10700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-11600
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
12 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
92%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-11600 Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| $213.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
