In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i5-11600 is slightly slower than the Core i5-9400F and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $20 more expensive!
Core i5-11600
- Is 2 years and 2 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Jan 08, 2019
- Is 2 years and 2 months newer
Core i5-9400F
- Up to 3% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 226 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in The Last of Us Part I
- Up to 14% cheaper – $119.99 vs $140.00
- Up to 14% cheaper
- Up to 16% better value in The Last of Us Part I – $0.53 vs $0.63/FPS
- Up to 16% better value in The Last of Us Part I
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i5-11600 vs Core i5-9400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-11600
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
219 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
97%
Price, $
$140
85%
Value, $/FPS
$0.63/FPS
84%
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
226 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
169 FPS
100%
Price, $
$119.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-11600 vs Core i5-9400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-11600 vs Core i5-9400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-11600
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
85%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
83%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-11600 Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9400F Jan 8th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Released | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| $213.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
