In Deathloop, the Core i5-1145G7 is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 9 285K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-1145G7
- Consumes up to 78% less energy – 28 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 78% less energy
Core Ultra 9 285K
- Up to 12% faster in Deathloop – 247 vs 221 FPS
- Up to 12% faster in Deathloop
- Is 4 years and 1 month newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Sep 02, 2020
- Is 4 years and 1 month newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-1145G7 vs Core Ultra 9 285K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 9 285K
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
247 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
185 FPS
100%
Price, $
$505.16
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.04/FPS
100%
![Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Tetracosa-core [24 Core] 3.70 GHz Processor - OEM Pack - Box](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/cpus/B0DFKC99VL.jpg)
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-1145G7 vs Core Ultra 9 285K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-1145G7 vs Core Ultra 9 285K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-1145G7
Sep 2nd, 2020
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
70%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
77%
Max. LPDDR4X RAM Speed
4267 MHz
67%
Core Ultra 9 285K
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-1145G7 Sep 2nd, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 285K Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 2nd, 2020 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
$309.00 | MSRP | $589.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1449 | Socket | LGA1851 |
28 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4267 MHz (LPDDR4X) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
